MA Dissertation
Assessment One
This assessment comprises an analysis of a dataset using SPSS and is worth 10% of the module marks.
Data Analysis
You are required to analyse the results of a community survey carried out in Uganda. (It was also done in other countries but they are not included here). The purpose was to find out about the nature of violence against women and girls (VAW/G) in three different communities (in the districts of Kayunga, Kawempe and Mukono), and in particular violent assaults using acid and other materials (acid and burn violence, ABV). We wanted to understand people’s knowledge and experience of this kind of violence, attitudes to it, support available and possible ways of combatting it.
The original questionnaire (a Word document), the Excel datasheet designed for data entry, and the final SPSS data file are included in the MyBeckett folder for information. Use the first two to help you understand the questions asked, and what the answers mean (i.e. the variable names, labels and coding in SPSS).
You are required to produce a clear, concise and professionally formatted report to explain the key findings and their implications.
Use your knowledge of SPSS to analyse the dataset and answer the questions below. Illustrate your results with tables or figures (chart/graph) as appropriate, and comment on each one (a few sentences is sufficient) – what they show, any points of interest etc. Analysis and interpretation should be based on the evidence from the survey and linked to relevant and related literature.
Questions
- What are the characteristics of the sample?
Numbers of respondents; district, gender, age and education profiles
- What are the main types of violence reported by people in their communities?
Are there differences among communities, or gender differences?
- What are people’s experiences of acid and burn violence (ABV)?
Who is affected; what substances are used; what thought to be the causes of attacks?
- What are attitudes to ABV?
Are there differences among communities or men and women?
Given the results, what do you think might be the prospects for changing attitudes?
- What do people know about access to legal or support services?
What are the implications for the project which is trying to provide support?
- Comment on the research, questionnaire and dataset as a whole.
What are the limitations?
What further research might be needed?
Copy your SPSS outputs into a Word document, and submit via the Turnitin link.
Deadline, midnight 2nd December
Word count: 1500 maximum (not including references)
You are not expected to know about this subject in detail already, and there is no single ‘right’ answer. You are being asked to use your judgement as researchers to extract from the dataset the key points and implications, and think about what your reader needs to understand. And also to think about what the research means, the methodology and any limitations, and link it to the literature (both methodological and subject-specific) on the subject.
There is no particular format you need to follow, but part of the assessment is about clear and accurate presentation of data, so you need to think about making it easy to understand by structuring it and possible use of sub-headings etc. as appropriate. Look at journal articles and reports for the style and quality of data presentation and reporting, and see further tips on presenting data below. No abstract is required, but a list of references used is needed at the end, using accurate Harvard format.
I recommend you save your Word document as a pdf before submitting via Turnitin. There have been occasional problems in the past of Turnitin affecting the formatting (e.g. spacing or text wrapping).
Tips & suggestions
Presenting quantitative data
You usually have a choice whether to present quantitative data as a Table or Figure. Each has its strengths and weaknesses, and the general rule should be that it clearly conveys the appropriate information to the reader.
Look at journal articles you are reading as part of your course. Look carefully at how data are presented – style, format, what information is in the title/legend, what is (and is not) included etc.
|
Tables |
Figures (Charts/Graphs) |
Advantages |
• Actual data figures remain clear
• Reader can perform further calculations / analysis
• Promotes careful reading |
• immediate visual impact
• suitable for the less numerate
• easy to interpret (or should be) |
Disadvantages |
• still an array of numbers to those who are less able to interpret them
• no immediate visual impact |
• actual numbers may not be apparent
• can mislead (perhaps not always unintentionally!)
• may be time consuming to produce |
Each Figure or Table must be self-explanatory – that is it can be understood by the reader without having to refer to the main body of text.
Each Figure or Table must have a legend (title) which clearly explains what it is, any abbreviations etc. If not obvious (e.g. a percentage is used), it is good practice to indicate the number of data points on which the results are based – e.g. n=50 means the sample was 50. Indicate if any data were omitted
Number Figures and Tables consecutively
The axes should always have a label (with units if appropriate, e.g. $ or kg), or indicate their meaning in the legend. Similarly table column or row headings should always be clear and concise, and include units if appropriate.
Convention is usually that Tables have their legends above, and Figures below
Don’t just paste SPSS output tables into Word and leave them as they are. They will almost always need editing as by default SPSS can provide lots of extra information which is unnecessary or confusing for the reader.
Think about the precision of your results – that is (usually) the number of decimal places. Just because SPSS produces output to 4 or more decimal places does not mean you should uncritically paste them in. If you weighed 10 people on a set of bathroom scales to the nearest kg, it would be ridiculous to say the average was 60.2345 kg. This implies you measured to a precision of one tenth of a gram – which you obviously did not.
The example below is from SPSS output. I hope you can see it is not appropriate to just cut and paste in to a report!
Suggestions for presenting data
Example
(note this is taken from some work looking at teaching reflective practice to students. Staff and students were given the same questionnaire and asked to rate their answers to a series of questions. There were 12 graphs produced – I have only shown 2 here which is why they have the numbers 10 and 12 on them)
Figure 1. Responses to questions on reflective practice (RP) by students (shaded bars, n = 67) and staff (open bars, n = 19), where responses range from 0 = strongly disagree, to 5 = strongly agree.
You are then expected to comment on and interpret the results you have presented in the text.
What not to write…
Fig. 1.10 shows that 10% of students strongly disagreed, 10% slightly agreed … blah blah blah, and that 70% of staff strongly agreed… … , and Figure 1.12 shows that 0 staff strongly disagreed and 0 staff disagreed … … blah blah. … etc. We can see that!
The whole purpose of figures or tables is to show the results in an easy-to-read format, rather than writing them out in long detail which is dull and hard to understand. Don’t repeat the contents of figures or tables in the text. Draw attention to overall similarities/differences, or highlight particular points of interest, but concentrate on the significance / meaning / implications of what you have found. Critical analysis of information is what is needed for high marks.
So for the example above, it might be:
“It is clear from the above data (Fig. 1) that there are substantial differences in the perceptions of staff and students about whether reflective practice helps students to recognise what they do well or helps with other activities. Staff largely regard reflective practice as beneficial, while students are broadly equivocal. Such strong differences suggest further work is needed to understand why such differences occur, and staff may need to more clearly communicate what the advantages are and ensure students recognise the benefits.”
Some other tips
Grouping data
- To help analysis, interpretation & presentation, data can be grouped into classes
- Particularly used for continuous interval data (age, cost, number of visits etc)
- Can also be for ordinal (e.g. combining those who were “very satisfied” or “mostly satisfied” etc)
- Make sure the classes do not overlap, e.g. 0-10, 10-20, 20-30
- Deciding the class boundaries, and therefore the class size can make a difference
- Too many doesn’t achieve much; Too few can hide important variation
- Can have open-ended classes if appropriate, e.g. <10, 25 or more
- No ‘hard and fast’ rule, but the choice of class boundaries can make a difference – try different ones on your data to check
Don’t use figures which are not necessary, or fancy colours, shapes or 3D options which may be available in some software.
So below, what is the point of a 3D pie chart, where part of a sentence saying ‘85% of people said yes’ would be enough
Resources
Bryman A (2012) Social Research Methods (4th ed.) Chapters 15 Quantitative Data Analysis, and 16 Using IBM SPSS for Windows. [Same chapters in the 2016 5th edition too]
There are lots of guides to using SPSS in the library – search the catalogue
SPSS e-tutor available at http://commons.esc.edu/spss/about/
Lots of other resources in Skills for Learning
http://skillsforlearning.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/local/research/analysing_and_presenting_data/04.shtml#spss
SPSS is available to download to your laptop or home computer via the library Student IT Support page http://libguides.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/it_support/software/get_SPSS
Use Discover or Google Scholar to find items of relevance to the topic and UN Women has a searchable site http://www.unwomen.org/en
Need full answers $30 through freelanceresearch89@gmail.com